Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

AWO.A.EFVS.108 CS AWO.A.EFVS.108 Enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) level of safety

All Weather Operations (CS-AWO) · CS-AWO · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

IRImplementing rule

AWO.A.EFVS.108CS AWO.A.EFVS.108 Enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) level of safety

- (a) The safety design goals for airworthiness approval shall be established and shall consider the phase of flight and include the required: - (1) accuracy, - (2) continuity, - (3) availability, and - (4) integrity. - (b) An FHA shall be conducted in accordance with CS 23.2510 or CS 25.1309 as applicable. - (c) The EFVS safety level (failure and performance) shall not be less than the safety level required for non-EFVS-A-based precision and non-precision approaches (NPAs) with DAs/DHs of 60 m (200 ft) or above. - (d) The ability of the pilot(s) to cope with any failures identified in the SSA or to provide intervention to limit the effect of a hazard shall be demonstrated and justified.

- (e) In showing compliance, any probabilities used shall not be factored by the fraction of approaches which are made using EFVS. - (f) For EFVS-L, a satisfactory level of safety (failure and performance) appropriate to the operations being addressed shall be demonstrated with the visual segment primarily accomplished by the use of an EFVS-L rather than natural vision. - (g) For EFVS-L, a system evaluation shall be conducted to establish the failure modes and determine whether the pilot can safely land and roll out with available natural vision plus whatever remains of the EFVS-L. The evaluation shall not assume that a safe landing can be achieved with only available natural vision after any failure of the EFVS-L.

[Issue: CS-AWO/2]

IR · AWO.A.EFVS.108 — CS-AWO · ED Decision 2022/007/R · CS-AWO Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC AWO.A.EFVS.108 EFVS level of safety

Show the text

During the development and design of an EFVS, the safety design goals for airworthiness approval should be established. The safety criteria for each phase of flight, including approach and landing systems, should be defined in terms of accuracy, continuity, availability, and integrity. Appropriate design guidance should be used to determine the overall required level of safety for the aircraft, in any mode of flight, and for any combination of failures which can cause an unsafe condition in order for them to be fully assessed and categorised. This should include the ability of the flight crew to cope with these failures. The hazard level for any aircraft system will depend on the ability of the flight crew to cope with failures. For failures where the SSA assumes a particular pilot intervention to limit the hazard effects (for example, from catastrophic or hazardous to major or minor), it should be shown that the pilot can be relied on to perform that intervention. For example, the pilot might be assumed to detect a system error because of other displays or out-the-window view.

It should be demonstrated that flight crew can detect the error in a timely fashion and not be hazardously misled. The demonstration must validate the hazard classification contained in either CS 23.2510 or CS 25.1309, as appropriate.

The applicant should demonstrate a satisfactory safety (failure and performance) level which should not be lower than the safety level required for precision and NPAs with decision altitudes (DAs) of 200 ft or above without the use of an EFVS. In showing compliance, probabilities cannot be factored by the fraction of approaches which are performed using EFVS. Consideration, however, can be given to the EFVS critical flight time, such as from the highest DH that can be expected for an approach to 100 ft above the TDZE using an EFVS-A.

The selected DALs are directly linked to the specific intended use and to the specific EFVS installation as an integrated part of the flight deck flight information system.

In showing compliance with these safety criteria, the probabilities of failure conditions of an EFVS-L should not be factored by the fraction of approaches which require an EFVS-L. The probabilities of failure conditions of an EFVS-L should also not be factored by a statistical distribution of visibility conditions. The exposure time used for failure calculations of an EFVS-L should be the elapsed time from descent below the highest expected DA/H for the approach using an EFVS-L to completion of roll-out to a safe taxi speed.

Any malfunction, fault detection and annunciation schemes should satisfy the required levels of safety and should perform their intended functions.

[Issue: CS-AWO/2]

Easy Access Rules for All-Weather Operations (CS-AWO)

AMC — CS-AWO · ED Decision 2022/007/R · CS-AWO Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

All rules in SUBPART A -ENABLING EQUIPMENT SECTION 1 -AUTOMATIC LANDING SYSTEMS (ALSS)

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 14 Aug 2026, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about AWO.A.EFVS.108 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.