Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

AWO.A.EFVS.107 CS AWO.A.EFVS.107 Enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) safety assessment

All Weather Operations (CS-AWO) · CS-AWO · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

IRImplementing rule

AWO.A.EFVS.107CS AWO.A.EFVS.107 Enhanced flight vision system (EFVS) safety assessment

- (a) The normal operation of the EFVS shall not adversely affect, or be adversely affected by, other aircraft systems. - (b) A safety assessment of the installed EFVS, considered separately and in conjunction with other relevant installed systems, shall be conducted to meet the requirements of CS 23.2510 or CS 25.1309 as applicable. - (c) The EFVS design shall be assessed in accordance with the specifications of either CS 23.2510 or CS 25.1309 as applicable. - (d) An aircraft- and system-level functional hazard assessment (FHA) and system safety assessment (SSA) shall be prepared to determine the hazard level associated with the system failure conditions and to determine the minimum required software and hardware design assurance levels (DALs). - (e) Any alleviating flight crew actions that are considered in the EFVS safety analysis shall be validated during testing for incorporation in the AFM. - (f) The flight crew workload shall be assessed in accordance with CS 23.2600 or CS 25.1302 as applicable.

[Issue: CS-AWO/2]

IR · AWO.A.EFVS.107 — CS-AWO · ED Decision 2022/007/R · CS-AWO Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC AWO.A.EFVS.107 EFVS safety assessment

Show the text

The safety assessment should show that the applicant's specific installation meets all the integrity criteria for the aircraft systems and for the EFVS. All aircraft configurations to be certified should be addressed.

The applicant may need to assess by flight test or simulation the effects of combinations of EFVS malfunctions that are not classified as Catastrophic by the functional hazard analysis (FHA) (to support compliance demonstration to CS 23.2500(a), CS 23.2500(b), CS 23.2510, CS 23.2605 or CS 25.1309, as applicable).

The overall level of safety of the aircraft is based on installed equipment. A complete system safety assessment (SSA) should be conducted. The SSA should consider the potential for hazardously misleading information (HMI) being presented to the flight crew. Examples of HMI that should be considered include at least information providing attitude, altitude, and distance cues as outside terrain imagery, frozen and offset imagery.

EFVS fail-safe features

The normal operation of the EFVS may not adversely affect, or be adversely affected by, other normally operating aircraft systems. Detected malfunctions of the EFVS which could cause display of misleading information should be annunciated and the misleading information removed. The criticality of the EFVS's fun ction to display imagery, including the potential to display HMI, should be assessed according to CS 25.1309 and AMC 25-11. Likewise, the hazard effects of any malfunction of the EFVS that could adversely affect interfaced equipment or associated systems should be determined and assessed according to CS 25.1309 and AMC 25-11. Similar criteria can be found in CS 23.2510. This requirement should be met through an SSA and documented via fault tree analysis (FTA), failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), and failure mode and effects analysis substantiation (FMEA substantiation), or equivalent safety documentation.

[Issue: CS-AWO/2]

AMC — CS-AWO · ED Decision 2022/007/R · CS-AWO Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 14 Aug 2026

All rules in SUBPART A -ENABLING EQUIPMENT SECTION 1 -AUTOMATIC LANDING SYSTEMS (ALSS)

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 14 Aug 2026, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about AWO.A.EFVS.107 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.