Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

21.B.432 Oversight programme

Annex I · Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

IRImplementing rule

21.B.432Oversight programme

(a)The competent authority shall establish and maintain an oversight programme covering the oversight activities required to comply with point 21.B.431(a).

(b)The oversight programme shall take into account the specific nature of the organisation, the complexity of its activities, the results of past certification or oversight activities, or both, and it shall be based on the assessment of the associated risks. It shall include, within each oversight planning cycle:

1.assessments, audits and inspections, including, where appropriate:

(i)management system assessments and process audits;

(ii)product, UAS and CMU audits of a relevant sample of the design and certification of the products, parts, appliances, UAS, CMUs and CMU components that are within the scope of work of the organisation;

(iii)sampling of the work performed;

(iv)unannounced inspections;

2.meetings convened between the head of the design organisation and the competent authority to ensure that both parties remain informed of all significant issues.

(c)The oversight planning cycle shall not exceed 24 months.

(d)Notwithstanding point (c), the oversight planning cycle may be extended to 36 months if the competent authority has established that during the previous 24 months:

1.the organisation has demonstrated that it can effectively identify aviation safety hazards and manage the associated risks;

2.the organisation has continuously demonstrated compliance with point 21.A.247 and has full control over all changes to the design management system;

3.no level 1 findings have been issued;

4.all corrective actions have been implemented within the time period that was accepted or extended by the competent authority as provided for in point 21.B.433(d). Notwithstanding point (c), the oversight planning cycle may be further extended to a maximum of 48 months if, in addition to the conditions laid down in points (d)(1) to (d)(4), the organisation has established, and the competent authority has approved, an effective continuous system for reporting to the competent authority on the safety performance and regulatory compliance of the organisation itself.

(e)The oversight planning cycle may be reduced if there is evidence that the safety performance of the organisation has decreased.

(f)The oversight programme shall include records of the dates when assessments, audits, inspections and meetings are due, and when assessments, audits, inspections and meetings have been effectively carried out.

(g)At the completion of each oversight planning cycle, the competent authority shall issue a recommendation report on the continuation of the approval, reflecting the results of the oversight.

IR · 21.B.432 — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · Regulation (EU) 2024/1108 · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 21.B.432Oversight programme

Show the text

ANNUAL REVIEW

(a)The oversight planning cycle and the related oversight programme for each organisation should be reviewed annually to ensure that they remain adequate regarding any changes in the nature of the organisation, the complexity of its activities or the safety performance of the organisation.

(b)When reviewing the oversight planning cycle and the related oversight programme, the competent authority should also consider any relevant information collected in accordance with point 21.B.431(c).

AMC · AMC1 21.B.432 — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 21.B.432(a)and (b) Oversight programme

Show the text

OVERSIGHT PLANNING

(a)When defining the oversight programme, the competent authority should assess the risks related to the activity and set-up of each organisation, and adapt the oversight to the level of risk identified and to the effectiveness of the organisation’s management system, in particular its ability to effectively manage safety risks.

(b)The competent authority should establish a schedule of assessments, audits and inspections that is appropriate to each organisation. The planning of assessments, audits and inspections should take into account the results of the hazard identification and the risk assessment conducted and maintained by the organisation as part of the organisation’s management system.

AMC · AMC1 21.B.432(a) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 21.B.432(b)Oversight programme

Show the text

SPECIFIC NATURE OF THE ORGANISATION AND COMPLEXITY OF ITS ACTIVITIES — RESULTS OF PAST OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES When determining the oversight programme, including a relevant sample of design activities under the scope of the organisation as product audits, the competent authority should consider in particular the following elements, as applicable:

(a)the effectiveness of the organisation’s management system in identifying and addressing non-compliances and safety hazards;

(b)the implementation by the organisation of any industry standards that are directly relevant to the organisation’s activity subject to Part 21;

(c)the procedure for the management and the scope of non-significant changes;

(d)the number of locations and the activities performed at each location;

(e)the number and scope of subcontractors that perform design activities; and

(f)the overall volume of activity and, as applicable, per specific product.

AMC · AMC1 21.B.432(b) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC2 21.B.432(b)Oversight programme

Show the text

SUBCONTRACTED ACTIVITIES If a design organisation subcontracts design activities, the competent authority should determine whether the subcontracted organisations need to be audited and include this in the oversight programme, taking into account the specific nature and complexity of the subcontracted activities, the results of previous oversight activities of the design organisation, and assessment of the associated risks. For such an audit, the competent authority inspectors should ensure that they are accompanied throughout the audit by a representative of the design organisation. NOTE: If a design organisation subcontracts design activities, the competent authority should verify that the design organisation has sufficient control over the subcontracted activities and manages the related risks.

AMC · AMC2 21.B.432(b) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 21.B.432(b)(1)Oversight programme

Show the text

ASSESSMENTS, AUDITS AND INSPECTIONS

(a)The oversight programme should indicate which aspects of the approval will be covered by each assessment, audit or inspection.

(b)Audits may be complemented by a review of the independent monitoring function results related to the topic of the audit.

(c)At the conclusion of the assessment, audit, or inspection, the DOA team should complete a report that identifies the areas and processes that were covered and includes all the findings and observations that were raised.

AMC · AMC1 21.B.432(b)(1) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC2 21.B.432(c)Oversight programme

Show the text

OVERSIGHT PLANNING CYCLE — AUDIT

(a)The beginning of the first oversight planning cycle is determined by the date of issue of the first approval.

(b)The oversight planning should include at least one on-site audit within each oversight planning cycle. For organisations that carry out their regular activities at more than one site, the determination of the sites to be audited should consider the results of past oversight activities and the volume of activity at each site, as well as the main risk areas identified.

AMC · AMC2 21.B.432(c) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 21.B.432(d)and (e) Oversight programme

Show the text

EXTENSION OF THE OVERSIGHT PLANNING CYCLE BEYOND 24 MONTHS

(a)When at the time before applicability of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/201 the oversight planning cycle was determined to be 36 months, the oversight planning cycle can continue to be 36 months unless the criteria of point (b) would apply.

(b)If the results of the oversight activities indicate an overall decrease in the safety performance or regulatory compliance of the organisation, the competent authority should consider reverting back to a 24-month oversight planning cycle or adapt the oversight planning accordingly.

(c)In order to be able to apply an oversight planning cycle beyond 36 months, the competent authority should agree on the format and contents of regular reporting to be made by the organisation on its safety performance and regulatory compliance.

AMC · AMC1 21.B.432(d) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

All rules in SECTION B — PROCEDURES FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 27 Nov 2025, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about 21.B.432 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.