Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

145.B.350 Findings and corrective actions; observations

Annex II (Part-145) · Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

IRImplementing rule

145.B.350Findings and corrective actions; observations

(a)The competent authority shall have a system in place to analyse findings for their safety significance.

(b)A level 1 finding shall be issued by the competent authority when any significant non-compliance is detected with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, with the organisation’s procedures and manuals, or with the organisation’s certificate including the terms of approval, which lowers safety or seriously endangers flight safety. Level 1 findings shall also include:

(1)any failure to grant the competent authority access to the organisation’s facilities referred to in point 145.A.140 during normal operating hours and after two written requests;

(2)obtaining the organisation certificate or maintaining its validity by falsification of the submitted documentary evidence;

(3)any evidence of malpractice or fraudulent use of the organisation certificate;

(4)the lack of an accountable manager.

(c)A level 2 finding shall be issued by the competent authority when any non-compliance is detected with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, with the organisation’s procedures and manuals, or with the organisation’s certificate including the terms of approval, which is not classified as a level 1 finding.

(d)When a finding is detected during oversight or by any other means, the competent authority shall, without prejudice to any additional action required by Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, communicate in writing the finding to the organisation and request corrective action to address the non-compliance identified. If a level 1 finding directly relates to an aircraft, the competent authority shall inform the competent authority of the Member State in which the aircraft is registered.

(1)If there are any level 1 findings, the competent authority shall take immediate and appropriate action to prohibit or limit the activities of the organisation involved and, if appropriate, it shall take action to revoke the certificate or to limit or suspend it in whole or in part, depending on the extent of the level 1 finding, until successful corrective action has been taken by the organisation.

(2)If there are any level 2 findings, the competent authority shall:

(i)grant the organisation a corrective action implementation period that is appropriate to the nature of the finding, and that in any case shall initially not be more than 3 months. The period shall commence from the date of the written communication of the finding to the organisation requesting corrective action to address the non-compliance identified. At the end of that period, and subject to the nature of the finding, the competent authority may extend the 3-month period provided that a corrective action plan has been agreed with the competent authority;

(ii)assess the corrective action plan and implementation plan proposed by the organisation, and if the assessment concludes that they are sufficient to address the non-compliance, accept them.

(3)If the organisation fails to submit an acceptable corrective action plan, or fails to perform the corrective action within the time period accepted or extended by the competent authority, the finding shall be raised to level 1 and action shall be taken as laid down in point (d)(1).

(4)The competent authority shall record all the findings that it has raised or that have been communicated to it in accordance with point (e) and, where applicable, the enforcement measures it has applied, as well as all corrective actions and the dates of the action closures for all the findings.

(e)Without prejudice to any additional enforcement measures, when an authority performing the oversight tasks pursuant to point 145.B.300(d) identifies any non-compliance with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts by an organisation certified by the competent authority of another Member State or the Agency, it shall inform that competent authority and provide an indication of the level of the finding.

(f)The competent authority may issue observations for any of the following cases not requiring level 1 or level 2 findings:

(1)for any item whose performance has been assessed to be ineffective;

(2)when it has been identified that an item has the potential to cause a non-compliance under points (b) or (c);

(3)when suggestions or improvements are of interest for the overall safety performance of the organisation. The observations issued under this point shall be communicated in writing to the organisation and recorded by the competent authority.

IR · 145.B.350 — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · Regulation (EU) 2021/1963 · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

GMGuidance material

GM1 145.B.350(f)Findings and corrective actions; observations

Show the text

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ‘LEVEL 2 FINDING’ AND ‘OBSERVATION’

(a)‘Findings’ are issued for non-compliance with the Regulation, whereas ‘observations’ may be issued to an organisation remaining compliant with the Regulation while additional inputs for the organisation could be considered for continuous improvement. However, the competent authority may decide to issue a ‘level 2’ finding when the ‘observations’ process is not managed correctly or overlooked.

(b)Examples to help differentiate between a ‘level 2 finding’ and an ‘observation’ are provided below, based on the provisions for the control and calibration of tools in accordance with point 145.A.40(b). Example of a ‘level 2 finding’ The organisation could not demonstrate compliance with some elements of 145.A.40(b) regarding the control register of the tools, equipment and particularly test equipment process as evidenced by:

(1)the fact that some sampled tools physically available in the tools store were missing in the tools control register managed by the organisation;

(2)the fact that one tool has not been correctly identified (e.g. incorrect P/N, S/N) in the tools control register. Examples of ‘observations’ Accumulation of tools in the store not sent yet for calibration. This situation could generate some consequences on the availability of tools and operational capabilities during a peak of activities (ineffectiveness of the process). The process to manage the tools control register through the dedicated software is not detailed enough (potential to cause a level 2 finding). The colour of the ‘unserviceable’ tag of the tools could generate some confusion. The organisation should consider changing the colour of this unserviceable tag to better alert the staff on the particular status of the unserviceable tools (potential improvement).

GM · GM1 145.B.350(f) — Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 · ED Decision 2022/011/R · Continuing Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 2 Sep 2025

All rules in SECTION B — AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 2 Sep 2025, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about 145.B.350 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.