Articles
Generic AI vs Aviation AI
Where generic AI tools help, where they fall short for EASA work, and what aviation-specific AI adds: source control, structure, traceability and review.
9 articles
- ChatGPT Memory Is Not Enough in AviationChatGPT memory and custom instructions can describe your aviation role, but they cannot replace controlled sources, organisation context and human review.
9 min - What the AI Context Window Means for AviationThe AI context window is the working memory behind each answer. In aviation, its limits and hallucination risk still need a human check.
8 min - Build or Buy Aviation AI: Key ConsiderationsHow aviation organisations should compare generic AI, internal builds, custom GPTs, SaaS tools, integrations, maintenance and auditability.
8 min - Shadow AI in Aviation: Personal Tools at WorkAviation staff already use personal AI tools at work. The risk is unmanaged use without policy, sources, traceability or review.
7 min - Where Aviation Teams Should Start With AIStart AI with checkable preparation work: meeting records, procedure drafts, audit packs, evidence lists and CAPs. Keep approval and sign-off human.
10 min - Chatbots vs Aviation Agents: The DifferenceAI agents can read, draft, fill and check across aviation tasks. The main agent types, where they go wrong, and the permissions and review gates they need.
6 min - Who Should Pay for Personal AI at Work?Many professionals pay for AI themselves and use it for work. Who should pay, why company workspaces only fix half of it, and what work-grade AI needs.
7 min - Can You Use ChatGPT for EASA Compliance Work?ChatGPT can explain, draft and summarise EASA material. Before relying on it, check Regulation vs AMC vs GM, the amendment in force and your manual.
6 min - Generic vs Aviation AI: AccountabilityGeneric AI tools are good at desk work. Aviation work also needs controlled sources, structured drafts, traceability and a hard stop before approval.
9 min