6.1.2.After making the decision: checking the relevance of the initial assessment

6.1.2. After making the decision: checking the relevance of the initial assessment The impact assessment made prior to making the decision to implement remote aerodrome ATS operations might need to be revised successively, as various aspects of the assessment initially made or a change of context of operations, etc. could introduce new elements for consideration, including from the social perspective. One of the main factors of success for remote aerodrome ATS implementation, both for transition and longer-term safety and economic performance, is to make the right choice of location for the new remote aerodrome ATS operation. To inform this decision, here are some examples of criteria to consider, which again may have both positive and negative impacts. Difference and desirability of new location (rural/city, facilities, housing, connectivity) Change in cost of living or higher cost of living versus other operations, but no increase in remuneration for affected staff as still providing same role — this could affect staff willing to transition and affect longer-term retention of staff. Loss of experienced staff Change in demographics of the unit A continual high churn rate could result in increased/continual training costs for the ANSP. Challenges in both recruitment needed at transition due to staff who choose not to relocate and future recruitment. Connectivity to aerodromes covered — not only the distance, but how easy it is to access from other locations (rail/air/road) Transition costs (travel for training/familiarisation whilst existing operation continues) Stakeholder interfaces — aerodrome operator, airspace users-ATS interfaces meetings (where in-person meetings are required) Career development for people affected Change in task allocation (multiple validations) It is important that the decision on the location is based not on just short-term assessments, but also considers the longer-term impacts that could undo the economic savings/benefits. The selection of an appropriate location could even resolve existing challenges with the current conventional location. Also the specific location might imply changes to the service provision;, therefore, a local validation is recommended. On the involvement of users, see Section 6.4.