Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

21.B.225 Findings and corrective actions; observations

Annex I · Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

IRImplementing rule

21.B.225Findings and corrective actions; observations

(a)The competent authority shall have a system in place to analyse findings for their safety significance.

(b)A level 1 finding shall be issued by the competent authority when any significant non-compliance is detected with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, with the organisation’s procedures and manuals, or with the certificate including the terms of approval which lowers safety or seriously endangers flight safety. The level 1 findings shall also include:

1.any failure to grant the competent authority access to the organisation’s facilities referred to in point 21.A.9 during normal operating hours and after two written requests;

2.obtaining the production organisation approval certificate or maintaining its validity by falsification of the submitted documentary evidence;

3.any evidence of malpractice or fraudulent use of the production organisation approval certificate; and

4.failure to appoint an accountable manager pursuant to point 21.A.245(a)/

(c)A level 2 finding shall be issued by the competent authority when any non-compliance is detected with the applicable requirements of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, with the organisation’s procedures and manuals, or with the certificate including the terms of approval, which is not classified as a level 1 finding.

(d)When a finding is detected during oversight or by any other means, the competent authority shall, without prejudice to any additional action required by Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts, communicate in writing the finding to the organisation and request corrective action to address the non-compliance(s) identified. Where a level 1 finding directly relates to an aircraft, the competent authority shall inform the competent authority of the Member State in which the aircraft is registered.

1.If there are any level 1 findings, the competent authority shall take immediate and appropriate action to prohibit or limit the activities of the organisation involved and, if appropriate, it shall take action to revoke the production organisation approval certificate or to limit or suspend it in whole or in part, depending upon the extent of the level 1 finding, until successful corrective action has been taken by the organisation.

2.If there are any level 2 findings, the competent authority shall:

(i)grant the organisation a corrective action implementation period that is appropriate to the nature of the finding, and that in any case shall initially not be more than 3 months. The period shall commence from the date of the written communication of the finding to the organisation requesting corrective action to address the non-compliance identified. At the end of this period, and subject to the nature of the finding, the competent authority may extend the 3-month period provided that a corrective action plan has been agreed by the competent authority;

(ii)assess the corrective action and implementation plan proposed by the organisation, and if the assessment concludes that they are sufficient to address the non-compliance, accept them;

(iii)if the organisation fails to submit an acceptable corrective action plan, or fails to perform the corrective action within the time period accepted or extended by the competent authority, the finding shall be raised to level 1 and action shall be taken as laid down in point (d)(1).

(e)The competent authority may issue observations for any of the following cases not requiring level 1 or level 2 findings:

1.for any item whose performance has been assessed to be ineffective; or

2.when it has been identified that an item has the potential to cause a non-compliance under points (b) or (c); or

3.when suggestions or improvements are of interest for the overall safety performance of the organisation. The observations issued under this point shall be communicated in writing to the organisation and recorded by the competent authority.

IR · 21.B.225 — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · Regulation (EU) 2022/203 · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM 21.B.225(a)Objective evidence

Show the text

Objective evidence is a fact which is, or can be documented, based on observations, measurements or tests that can be verified. Objective evidence generally comes from the following: a) documents or manuals b) examination of equipment/products c) information from interview questions and observations of POA activities.

GM · GM 21.B.225(a) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2012/020/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC 21.B.225(a)Notification of findings

Show the text

In case of a level one finding confirmation must be obtained in a timely manner that the accountable manager received the letter containing details of the level one finding and the approval suspension details. A level two finding requires timely and effective handling by the competent authority to ensure completion of the corrective action. This includes intermediate communication, including reminding letters as necessary, with the POA holder to verify that the corrective action plan is followed.

AMC · AMC 21.B.225(a) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2012/020/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM1 21.B.225(b)Findings and corrective actions; observations

Show the text

EXAMPLE OF A LEVEL 1 FINDING The production organisation cannot demonstrate compliance with 21.A.139(d)2.(xii) and 21.A.163(c), as evidenced by: The POA holder released the ‘critical’ Part No XXX, Serial Number YYY with EASA Form 1 No ZZZZ having ticked the box ‘Certifies that the items identified above were manufactured in conformity to: approved design data and are in a condition for safe operation’; while:

(a)the released part is not included in the organisation’s capability list/scope of work; and/or

(b)the POA holder could not demonstrate that the released part is covered by an EASA approved/accepted type design. Consequently, the released part is not eligible for installation on in-service type-certificated aircraft.

GM · GM1 21.B.225(b) — Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 · ED Decision 2023/014/R · Initial Airworthiness Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 27 Nov 2025

All rules in SECTION B — PROCEDURES FOR COMPETENT AUTHORITIES

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 27 Nov 2025, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about 21.B.225 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.