Skip to content

A gradual release of Avioverse begins in October 2026. Request early access →

ARGH.OVS.330 Cooperative oversight

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/23 · Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

IRImplementing rule

ARGH.OVS.330Cooperative oversight

(a)The competent authorities responsible for the oversight of organisations providing ground handling services in more than one Member State or at aerodromes that are under the oversight responsibility of more than one competent authority shall cooperate to ensure effective and efficient oversight of those organisations and their services. Those competent authorities shall ensure mutual exchange of information and assistance to complete their oversight tasks and responsibilities.

(b)The cooperative oversight shall cover the following organisations having their principal place of business in a Member State and providing ground handling services in more than one Member State or at aerodromes that are under the oversight responsibility of more than one competent authority:

(1)independent providers of ground handling services;

(2)self-handling aircraft operators that may or may not be part of a single air carrier business grouping.

(c)The mutual exchange of information shall cover the following elements:

(1)declarations of ground handling organisations and related documents to prove compliance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 and its delegated and implementing acts;

(2)AltMoC used;

(3)audit reports, findings raised, corrective actions, corrective-action plans, root-cause analyses, and any other information on the relevant findings raised, follow-up actions, as well as any enforcement measures taken as a result of oversight;

(4)information stemming from mandatory and voluntary occurrence reporting as required by point ORGH.GEN.160 of Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20.

(d)The tasks for the oversight of a ground handling organisation referred to in point (b) shall be assigned in accordance with points (e) and (f).

(e)The competent authority of the Member State where the organisation has its principal place of business shall verify all the following elements listed in Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20, either on its own or supported by any of the other competent authorities concerned, followed by inspections of ground handling activities performed at aerodromes in its State, to verify that the implementation of the organisation’s management system elements is performed as documented:

(1)the organisation’s management system elements referred to in point ORGH.MGM.200 of Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20 relating to the organisational structure, processes, programmes and procedures applicable to the ground handling organisation as a whole;

(2)safety policies and processes, safety management system, including hazard identification, risk assessment and mitigation, including mitigation of safety risks specific to the operational context at the aerodrome(s) subject to oversight;

(3)the safety and occurrence reporting process and the reports related to the provision of ground handling services at the aerodrome(s) subject to oversight;

(4)the management of changes and the declaration;

(5)the compliance monitoring function;

(6)the record-keeping and documentation system, including the ground handling manual;

(7)the ground handling training programmes, including the training records;

(8)the GSE maintenance programme;

(9)any other overarching organisational processes, programmes and procedures within the scope of its declaration and applicable to the organisation as a whole.

(f)Each competent authority of the Member States where the organisation provides ground handling services, other than the Member State where its principal place of business is located, shall oversee the safe provision of services at the stations in their Member State, by verifying the actual implementation of:

(1)the organisation’s management system elements referred to in point ORGH.MGM.200 of Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20, particularly relating to the ground handling organisation’s activities at the station under its oversight:

(i)the organisational structure referred to in point ORGH.MGM.200(b)(1) of Annex I to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20 and the ground handling activities;

(ii)hazard identification;

(iii)the risk assessment and mitigation, including mitigation of safety risks specific to the provision of services at the station(s) subject to oversight;

(iv)the content of the ground handling manual, including the procedures and instructions of the aircraft operators operating at the station(s) subject to oversight, as well as the procedures of the relevant aerodrome operator(s);

(v)training records and implementation of the training programme at the station(s) subject to oversight;

(vi)the GSE maintenance programme;

(vii)occurrence reports and internal safety reports relevant for the provision of ground handling services at the station(s) subject to oversight;

(2)the operational requirements of Annex II to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/20.

(g)Each of the competent authorities referred to in points (e) and (f) shall:

(1)agree with the ground handling organisation on the proposed corrective-action plan and corrective actions to address the non-compliances identified at the station under their oversight;

(2)inform all the other competent authorities concerned on the audits and inspections reports and the corrective actions.

(3)In case of a level 1 finding raised to an organisation referred to in point (b), the competent authority raising the finding shall immediately inform the other competent authorities concerned. Each of the competent authorities responsible for the oversight of that organisation shall assess whether and to what extent the finding affects the stations under its oversight. Each competent authority shall apply the most appropriate action it considers necessary to ensure, as the case may be, the closing of the non-compliance and remedy its consequences.

(4)In case of a level 1 finding raised on the lack of an accountable manager, the competent authority raising the finding shall immediately inform the other competent authorities concerned and they shall all apply the same action uniformly at all the stations under their oversight. They shall take any further enforcement measure necessary to ensure the closing of the non-compliance and remedy its consequences.

(h)All the competent authorities involved in the oversight of an organisation referred to in point (b) shall support the competent authority of the organisation’s principal place of business to periodically update the assessment of the safety performance of the organisation based on the oversight reports from individual stations in the other Member States.

(i)Any of the competent authorities responsible for the oversight of an organisation referred to in point (b) may support the competent authority of the Member State where the organisation has its principal place of business in performing the audits or inspections as specified in point (e).

(j)The competent authorities concerned shall establish procedures for the implementation of the cooperative oversight process to cover all the aspects detailed in points (a) to (i).

(k)The competent authorities shall use the repository of information established in accordance with Article 74 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 to access the documents and information referred to in point (c).

IR · ARGH.OVS.330 — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · Regulation (EU) 2025/23 · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM1 ARGH.OVS.330(a)Cooperative oversight

Show the text

MORE THAN ONE COMPETENT AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE FOR GH OVERSIGHT IN THE SAME MEMBER STATE Where an organisation referred to in point ARGH.OVS.330(b) provides GH services at aerodromes that are under the oversight of more than one competent authority within the same Member State, it is recommended that that Member State designate the competent authority of the Member State where the organisation has its PPoB for the purpose of establishing clear responsibilities as referred to in point ARGH.OVS.330(d).

GM · GM1 ARGH.OVS.330(a) — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · ED Decision 2025/006/R · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

AMCAcceptable means of compliance

AMC1 ARGH.OVS.330(c)(2)Cooperative oversight

Show the text

SHARING INFORMATION RELATED TO ALTERNATIVE MEANS OF COMPLIANCE

(a)If an AltMoC submitted by a GH organisation that is part of a single GH business grouping or a single air carrier business grouping for self-handling is applicable only to certain aerodromes, the competent authority receiving the AltMoC should ensure that all the competent authorities concerned have access to it.

(b)The competent authorities of the aerodromes where that AltMoC applies should cooperate to ensure that the content of the AltMoC is accepted and assessed consistently at all the aerodromes where it applies.

AMC · AMC1 ARGH.OVS.330(c)(2) — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · ED Decision 2025/006/R · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM1 ARGH.OVS.330(g);(j) Cooperative oversight

Show the text

SYSTEMIC AND OPERATIONAL NON-COMPLIANCE

(a)A systemic non-compliance is understood as a non-compliance related to the main components of a GH organisation’s management system, such as:

(1)the SMS,

(2)the compliance monitoring process,

(3)the documentation system,

(4)the training programme,

(5)the GSE operation and maintenance programme,

(6)the general approach to operational procedures.

(b)A systemic non-compliance does not refer to:

(1)operational procedures specific to an aerodrome as required by the aerodrome operator;

(2)safety risk assessment and risk mitigation measures developed for the operational context of an aerodrome.

(c)By comparison, an operational non-compliance is specific to an individual station, as it is related to the way in which the management system or operational requirements are implemented at that aerodrome. This type of non-compliance is, by default, non-systemic — that is, it does not occur at other stations where that GH organisation provides services. An operational non-compliance does not require action on the part of another competent authority in another Member State.

GM · GM1 ARGH.OVS.330(g) — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · ED Decision 2025/006/R · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM2 ARGH.OVS.330(g);(j) Cooperative oversight

Show the text

COOPERATIVE OVERSIGHT RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE CASE OF SYSTEMIC NON-COMPLIANCE (LEVEL 2 FINDINGS)

(a)If a systemic non-compliance of a GH organisation providing services in more than one Member State is not addressed at the management system level, it may cascade down to all the individual stations, thus generating findings at all stations where the organisation provides GH services. That is why a systemic non-compliance requires enhanced communication and cooperation between all the competent authorities overseeing that GH organisation: it is essential that they all apply similar corrective actions to address that non-compliance in the same manner at the affected stations under their oversight.

(b)When the competent authority of the Member State in which the organisation has its PPoB raises a finding on a management system component, it can already be considered potential systemic non-compliance. The other competent authorities concerned will use this information when preparing their own audits/inspections of stations in their Member State. Each competent authority is responsible for verifying that the systemic non-compliance has been addressed at the individual stations in its Member State.

(c)If a level 2 finding is raised by any competent authority other than that of the Member State in which the organisation has its PPoB, the systemic or operational nature of that non-compliance can only be determined once another audit/inspection in another Member State confirms it. As the information from all audits and inspections is shared among the competent authorities involved in the oversight of that organisation, they will all be aware of the systemic findings. As in the situation described in point (b), the other competent authorities concerned will use this information when preparing their own audits/inspections in their Member State. Each competent authority is responsible for verifying that the systemic non-compliance has been addressed at the individual stations in its Member State.

(d)The information related to systemic non-compliance can be useful for assessing the safety performance of the organisation as a whole.

GM · GM2 ARGH.OVS.330(g) — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · ED Decision 2025/006/R · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

GMGuidance material

GM3 ARGH.OVS.330(g);(j) Cooperative oversight

Show the text

COOPERATIVE OVERSIGHT ACTIONS The competent authorities concerned could consider any of the examples provided below to ensure continuing communication and consultation among themselves to establish efficient cooperative oversight.

(a)Develop a common toolbox of materials and checklists to be used when conducting inspections and audits.

(b)Establish procedures to cover methods and timing for communicating on and sharing of relevant information necessary for oversight, for example:

(1)sharing the result of the assessment of a management system every time an assessment is conducted by one of the competent authorities;

(2)sharing the AltMoC as soon as they are received by the competent authority of the Member State in which the organisation has its PPoB;

(3)ensuring a prompt reaction if one of the competent authorities shares serious concerns about the organisation with another competent authority.

(c)Develop a common training programme and deliver training sessions for all GH inspectors.

(d)Organise joint inspections and audits.

(e)Discuss the findings raised, their legal basis and the corrective actions proposed by the organisation. Identify the best way forward for similar cases.

(f)Organise recurrent training sessions that include the sharing of experiences with competent authorities in other Member States and exchange of best practices with inspectors from other competent authorities.

(g)Additional support could include the translation of relevant parts of audit reports or of occurrence reports from the original language into English or any other language upon which the competent authorities concerned agree.

GM · GM3 ARGH.OVS.330(g) — Regulations (EU) 2025/23 and 2025/24 · ED Decision 2025/006/R · Ground Handling Easy Access Rules · EAR revision 5 Nov 2025

All rules in ANNEX — AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS – GROUND HANDLING (PART-ARGH)

Consolidated from the EASA Easy Access Rules (revision 5 Nov 2025, extracted 17 Aug 2026) for convenience. Not the official publication — verify against the Official Journal of the European Union and the EASA publications before operational use.

Ask Metis about ARGH.OVS.330 →

Metis opens with Avioverse in October 2026 · request early access.